Thursday, October 21, 2010

(Just for fun) Sayuri’s interesting finding regarding a teenager creating her own video blogs


Retrieved 22 October, 2010 from http://ameblo.jp/c-cedille/


This may be called a 21st Century digital youth success story!?

I have found an American teenager, Emily, who has been generating YouTube video blogs mainly in Japanese which can relate to my teaching context (LOTE Japanese teaching).  She came to Japan when she was eighteen with a dream of becoming a Japanese style idol.  She had been learning Japanese she was twelve and when she was seventeen she started a video blog.  Now nineteen, Emily has a legion of fans to her blog and has achieved her dream of becoming a Japanese idol.


Japanese only except for a few English phrases at 3:10: Emily studied Japanese with animations and music in America.  Depending on the students’ language level and confidence level, this video clip may be able to motivate them with their Japanese.

English only: Emily starts talking about the trip in Japan after 3 minutes.
Japanese with English subtitles: Emily’s Japanese has markedly improved, but she does look, and talk, like a character from Japanese animations.  I believe this is intentional though as she is wanting to portray herself like this.

In English and Japanese
This is a free blog site that anyone can join and create their own blogs on.  Ameba has got a lot of members from the creative industries such as singers, actors, actresses and famous people.



Sayuri’s blog entry about a news article

Retrieved 7 October, 2010 from
http://www.brainbasedbusiness.com/2006/08/raise_the_collective_iq_of_wor.html


How does the social networking aspect of Facebook potentially lead to the creation of collective intelligence and why is this productive?

In this blog entry, I will discuss the Facebook’s collective intelligence potential through examining the content of the news article: For those with questions, Facebook offers answers (Evangelista, 2010).  Facebook’s collective intelligence potential is used through Facebook Questions where members can ask questions and gain answers from more than 500 million people worldwide (Ross, 2010).  Facebook Questions is a productive tool because it helps the user take advantage of the collective intelligence of knowledgeable people and/or your friends who know about your preferences.  "Because questions will also appear to your friends and their friends, you'll receive answers that are more personalized to you" (Evangelista, 2010, p. D2).

You can request questions to the community through the "Ask Question" button at the top of the homepage. You can also add a photo or poll to make your question more visible and specific.  All queries will be revealed to public.  Friends or specific groups of people can be chosen by posing a question as a status update on your profile targeted to those people.  Facebook Questions also enables you to check other people’s questions that are related to your subject.

For more information how to use this function, please go to the link http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=411795942130

“Collective intelligence (CI), … is a form of universally distributed intelligence, constantly enhanced, coordinated in real time ... The basis and goal of collective intelligence is the mutual recognition and enrichment of individuals rather than the cult of fetishized or hypostatized communities” (Lévy, 1997, p. 13). Jenkins (2007) emphasises that diversity is the key to a have richer final outcome in CI.

Facebook seems creative and useful in a similar way to Wikipedia to generate knowledge by people who share, produce and reproduce.  (Although the self-correction process is effective, caution should be used when taking advantage of this digital tool.)  Production of CI through Facebook may become more productive due to i) the gigantic information that 500 million people can share and ii) the system’s coordination that connects people who have the similar interests.  However, it is crucial for educators to teach their students pedagogical challenges with this technology such as credibility, commercialisation, copyright and plagiarism.



References

Evangelista, B. (2010, July 30). For those with questions, Facebook offers answers. San Francisco Chronicle, Retrieved October 1, 2010, from http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/07/30/BUT21ELFTH.DTL

Jenkins, H. (2007). WHAT WIKIPEDIA CAN TEACH US ABOUT THE NEW MEDIA LITERACIES (PART TWO). Retrieved October 4, 2010, from
http://www.henryjenkins.org/2007/06/what_wikipedia_can_teach_us_ab_1.html

Lévy, P. (1997). Collective Intelligence: Mankind's Emerging World in Cyberspace ( R. Bononno, Trans. ). Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

Ross, B. (2010). Searching for answers through Facebook Questions. Retrieved October 1, 2010, from
http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=411795942130

Monday, October 18, 2010

Meaghan's blog entry about transformations/innovative pedagogies


Innovative Pedagogies:
YouTube, Digital Literacy, and Public Libraries

As a library and information science student who is undertaking CLN647 as an elective, the context in which I will be working and applying the concepts and understandings I have gained from this unit is not in a classroom, or even a school library, but in a public library. This puts me in a really interesting position and learning environment, and actually gives me more freedom and opportunity in some regards to explore these ideas and technologies. For example, public libraries have much more open views on censorship and are governed by the Australian Library and Information Association’s core value of “Promotion of the free flow of information and ideas through open access to recorded knowledge, information, and creative works”(ALIA, 2010). This means that unlike schools, public libraries provide access to social networking and digital media technology such as YouTube, and libraries see their role as supporting the use of this information through information literacy, and more specifically, digital and media literacies.

“A thriving national and global culture, economy and democracy will best be advanced by people who are empowered in all walks of life to seek, evaluate, use and create information effectively to achieve their personal, social, occupational and educational goals. It is a basic human right in a digital world and promotes social inclusion within a range of cultural contexts” (ALIA, 2010).

It may seem like the stakes are not as high when considering the role of education and innovative pedagogies in public libraries, because people often look to the formal education system for outcomes and accountability for the educational well being of young people. However, in a public library space where clients are actively seeking information, access to technology, and information literacy because of their own need, desire, choice, and interest (not someone else’s perception of these) then I would argue that the stakes at public libraries are just as high – if not higher.

Access to YouTube
With students in Queensland Schools currently blocked from accessing YouTube while at school, public libraries are one of the few places that young people can get free access to view, contribute, and experience YouTube. This means that, now more than ever, public libraries have a duty and responsibility to not only provide this access, but to also provide opportunities for young people to engage with YouTube effectively and responsibly. This includes offering opportunities for instruction and guidance, and equipping young people with the skills and understanding to both navigate and evaluate the content on YouTube, but also to contribute and create their own content which is of value and relevance. Public libraries play a vital and valuable role in the digital and media literacy of their communities, and in providing opportunities for people (including young people) to engage with the information and knowledge.

Innovation without Trepidation
YouTube comes with inherent challenges, such as its lack of classification and its open access to a broad range of content, including that which might be considered exploitative, violent, or inappropriate for young people. These challenges, along with the fear of litigation, have seen the site blocked in Australian schools, and the benefits, educational value, and cultural significance overlooked. Fear has driven the decision to exclude students from YouTube in schools. This fear has also blocked and excluded students from unique and valuable information, knowledge, and the opportunity to develop the skills required to participate effectively in YouTube’s online space outside their classroom environment. Fortunately, public libraries can afford to be a little more fearless, and consequently, more innovative in the ways they engage with both the technology, and the people who use it. Such examples of innovation in digital and media literacies can be seen in libraries such as the Chicago Public Libraries YOUmedia program, and the State Library of Queensland’s Learning 2.0 program. Both are examples of innovation that have participation, user experience, and creation at their core. Learning and understanding new technology through doing and experiencing, rather than avoiding it because of fear. This is a core pedagogical understanding I will take with me to my future professional practice.

Information Literacy for YouTube
YouTube is a dynamic site, and the new digital competencies and media literacy skills that are needed in order for students to contribute and participate in the site effectively include:
  • video productions skills
  • audio production skills
  • presentation skills
  • scriptwriting skills
  • basic literacy skills
  • web skills
  • knowledge about promotion and marketing
  • evaluation skills
  • search strategy skills
  • play
  • performance
  • participation
  • simulation
  • appropriation
  • multitasking
  • distributed cognition
  • collective intelligence
  • judgment
  • networking
  • negotiation

This is significant set of skills and competencies for young people to develop on their own, which is why libraries play such an important role in supporting and fostering the development of these digital and media literacies. As Jenkins(2006) argues,

“Schools and afterschool programs must devote more attention to fostering what we call the new media literacies: a set of cultural competencies and social skills that young people need in the new media landscape” (Jenkins, 2006).

The convergence of technology, information, and media that occurs in sites such as YouTube has reinvigorated and transformed conceptions of information literacy in libraries, and now includes a specific focus on both media literacy and digital literacy. All of these skills need to be addressed by public libraries, and incorporated into their information literacy classes which, I believe, need to include a specific focus and appeal for young people engaging with YouTube.

In my future role in public libraries, I will endeavor to seek out opportunities and develop programs where young people can develop and expand their digital literacies, skills, and practical learning opportunities through the use of YouTube and other video sharing sites. These programs will be grounded in an understanding of new media and digital literacies, and have four main objectives with interrelated but distinct motivations, which have been informed by the ideas of the Digital Youth Network (Digital Youth Network, 2010).
  • The first objective is to ensure that young people posses a fundamental understanding of the various modes of communication that comprise the new media landscape, including Web 2.0 technologies such as wikis, blogs, podcasts, vodcasts, and social networking sites..
  • The second objective is rooted in the understanding that students learn new skills and applications for technologies most effectively when they experience it first hand and have the opportunity to interact and engage with digital media themselves.
  • The third objective is to ensure that young develop the skills necessary to think critically about the meaning and implications of new media messages as both consumers and producers.
  • The fourth objective is to instill a core set of values needed by young people to become productive and prosperous citizens in the 21st century.
By creating information literacy programs in public libraries which are engaging, collaborative, and provide guidance and insight into the implications of user generated content, young people will become better equipped to participate in the new digital landscape that YouTube is a significant part of. Innovative programs such as those at the Chicago public library are evidence of the impact and contribution public libraries can make in fostering the use of digital media and the skills required to use it effectively. The work of public libraries, particularly here in Australia, will also represent an important step in paving the way for school libraries and classrooms to develop similar programs and make valuable contributions to their students’ use of sites such as YouTube.
“Students are challenged to create media that reflect themselves and their surroundings. Through the process of learning to create, they also become critical consumers” (Digital Youth Network, 2010).


References



Meaghan's blog entry about an online resource

If they can do it, why can't we?

Discussing, learning, and using social networking sites and digital media applications such as Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube in classroom and library environments can and does significantly increase student engagement, both to the curriculum, but also to the technology itself. There is strong evidence of this engagement from the work of the MacArthur Foundation’s YouMedia program at the Chicago Public Library, and from initiatives like DigMe in the Minnesota High School system, as seen in the following clip.





“Students use social sites like Facebook and Twitter to communicate outside of class, so it only makes sense to use those tools to get the kids communicating during class”.
- Delainia Haug, Roosevelt High School English Teacher

Using social media has the potential to serve a number of functions in the classroom and school library. Firstly, it engages young people with the curriculum by catching the attention of the students and increasing their participation. Secondly, it prepares them for communicating in tomorrow’s new media landscape by exposing them to the tools and technologies as well as the discussions that surround these.

“We know from previous research that engagement is important for achievement. We know that digital media engages young people, and because we know that 21st century literacies are all about digital media”.
- Cynthia Lewis, University of Minnesota Educational Researcher.

Programs like that of DigMe at Roosevelt High School, and the YouMedia program at the Chicago Public Library are shining examples of what can be achieved when school systems and libraries engage with digital media, and consequently engage with their students and young people. So my question is… if they can do it, why can’t we?

What are we so afraid of here in Australia? Where is the innovation and participation and conversation about social networking sites and digital media? I’ll tell you where it is… it’s at home behind closed doors, or at lunch on mobile phones, or not at all. All of which, to me, seem to be far more scary than open an innovative participation and discussions on these ideas in our classrooms and libraries.

Meaghan's blog entry about a news article



Banning YouTube from students in Australian schools:
Helpful, hysterical, or down right hypocritical?


Queensland is amongst the Australian states and territories that have banned student use of the video sharing site YouTube. As this article from The Australian explains, educational authorities across Australian have blocked access to the site to protect students, to protect themselves, and to protect their bandwidth allocations.

 
Censorship is a complex issue in any context. It is an issue which becomes even more complicated when talking about the internet. However, when the discussion also involves young people… it becomes a virtual minefield. But is the banning of YouTube by education authorities in Australian schools helpful, hysterical, or just down right hypocritical?

Helpful?
Unlike traditional forms of media such as print, film, and television, which must adhere to strict classification regulations, the internet is open, accessible, and very difficult to regulate. The user generated content on YouTube is particularly susceptible to this lack of regulation, with the site hosting its fair share of content which many would consider inappropriate for young people. As the Brisbane Times reported, YouTube is “making it too easy for people to upload violent or sexually explicit content to the internet” (Brisbanetimes.com.au). It is therefore understandable that there is some concern and panic from educators, parents, and education authorities about young people accessing the site at school. As the Australian reported in its article,  the Queensland Minister for Education and Training in 2007, Rod Welford, said that student access to the site had been blocked in Queensland schools because "The website was considered unsafe because it was impossible to determine what sort of video material might be accessed by students" (2007).  

Hysterical?
Banning YouTube in schools does help protect students from exposure to inappropriate content while at school, but is this just a hasty, hysterical reaction by educational authorities which is driven by fear of the unknown, fear of the complexities, and fear of litigation? Rather than opening up a practical discussion with students about the complexities, benefits, and implications of both viewing and contributing content to YouTube, it appears that this has been put into the too hard basket. Rather than teaching kids the practical, ethical, and technical skills they need to effectively and safely engage with YouTube and other social media, students are being left to fend for themselves when they get home from school, using these sites and others with no guidance or supervision. Is branding YouTube, in the words of a spokesmen for the NSW Department of Education and Training, as a site that has “No educational value to it and the content of the material on the site”, a bit hysterical, if not a tad bit hypocritical?  

Hypocritical?
If YouTube is of “no educational value”, and deemed by education authorities in Australia to be so dangerous, inappropriate, and litigious that it has been blocked in our schools, then why is it being used by education departments around the country to promote their services, facilities, and initiatives? Why has the Queensland Department of Education and Training established its own YouTube channel DETQueensland, which is “building clever, skilled and creative Queenslanders” as the department “Seeks to open up new avenues of communication in the world of Web 2.0.” (Queensland Department of Education and Training, Educational Views, 2010), while their students have been blocked from exploring and being skilled in these same new avenues of communication?

“An exciting new online presence has been launched by the Department of Education and Training (DET) featuring short videos on a wide range of subjects of interest to teachers, schools and parents. The DET YouTube channel joins the department's recent forays into Twitter and Facebook.” (Queensland Department of Education and Training, Educational Views, 2010).

If these videos are of interest to teachers, schools and parents (I am assuming that if “schools” are distinct from “teachers” and “parents”, then by a process of elimination, the “schools” that the DET is referring to must be the students themselves), how indeed are these “schools” to view or interact with this information? 

Hazy?
So is blocking student access to YouTube in Australian schools helpful, hysterical, or hypocritical? It appears it might be all of these, so what then is the solution? With an issue as complex as censorship, involving a technology as dynamic as YouTube, surely there is a more complex and dynamic solution than putting it in the ‘too hard basket’ and leaving our students to navigate “this new avenue of communication” on their own. Surely in the "smart state" of Queensland, our "clever, skilled and creative Queenslanders" could think outside the too hard basket.

References:


Meaghan's blog entry about a journal article


Mind the Gaps:
What schools miss out on when they block access to YouTube

Currently, the video sharing website Youtube is blocked for use by students in Queensland schools (Queensland Department of Education and Training). Queensland students are not the only ones who are banned from the site. It is a similar story across all states and territories in Australia, and across many schools in the United States. The ban on the site is designed to shield students from inappropriate content and use, but YouTube is a dynamic website, and there is more to it than merely inappropriate or offensive material. What else are our students not being exposed to when they are excluded from using the site while at school? What knowledge, skills, and opportunities are also being blocked when YouTube is banned, and do the risks really outweigh the benefits?

Esther Rosenfeld’s article, Blocking Web 2.0 tools in schools: Creating a new digital divide explores some of these ideas and Rosenfeld argues that, “Such blanket blocking of Web 2.0 sites by district and school technology administrators prevents the effective use of technology in teaching, the acquisition of vital 21st-century literacy skills by students, and the professional development of teaching staff”.


I would argue that this “divide” which is being created when YouTube is blocked in schools goes even further than the digital divide which Rosenfeld has highlighted. More than just the skills, technologies, and digital literacies that students are missing out on, blocking access to YouTube also creates knowledge gaps, generational gaps, and gaps in the range of educational experiences and opportunities that students are exposed to.

Lost Knowledge
 With over 24 hours of video being uploaded to YouTube every minute, what information and knowledge is being filtered and blocked when schools block YouTube? What else are students not being exposed to, other than inappropriate material, when they are excluded from accessing the site? In his article, Marc Prensky argues that not only does YouTube contain important and valuable information and knowledge, but it contains information and knowledge of great importance and value which is unique and can’t be gained else where.

“Why is this new communication form – short, mostly self-created videos – so important for educators to understand? The answer is that a huge portion of the world's knowledge, especially new knowledge, is going uniquely into this form. There is unique video on practically every subject. Banning, or ignoring this work (as often happens in schools) is saying, in effect, “We don't want to give our students access to a large part of the world's knowledge.” (Prensky, 2010)


Now more than ever, people who have something to say, intellectual arguments to make, and have knowledge and information they want to communicate and share, are doing so in a non-written media, and choosing to share and collaborate using sites such as YouTube. As Prensky notes, “They are putting their thoughts and ideas into video rather than writing, and sharing them on sites such as ted.com, bigthink.com, and even You Tube. Today, when searching, if one does not perform a separate video search in addition to a Google search, one misses vital information” (Prensky, 2010).

So when students are excluded from accessing YouTube at school, they are also excluded from conversations, information, arguments, and knowledge which are unique and may be of great value to their learning and understanding of issues. They are also not being exposed to the practical skills that are required to acquire, evaluate, contribute, and use this knowledge and information effectively.

Undeveloped Skills 
In her article, Rosenfeld highlights the digital divide that is being created in the United States between those schools who allow access to YouTube, and those who don’t.

“We now have a new digital divide - between, on one side, students and teachers who have access to the tools of 21st-century learning and, on the other, those who have that access blocked. Too many schools prevent students from using the tools that these same students use outside school-tools that can engage and excite them to meaningful learning”. (Rosenfeld, 2008)

A number of parallels and similar divides can be seen in the Australian context. Firstly, those students who do not have access to the internet outside of school may never get the opportunity to access YouTube, and are therefore getting left behind in the skills and experiences they are acquiring. The same can be said on a global scale, where students in other countries are using YouTube in the classroom environment and developing their digital literacies and educational experiences in this context, while Australian students are not because they are blocked from accessing the site. This includes both the information and content that is available on YouTube, and also the skills required to acquire, evaluate, contribute, and use this information. As Rosenfeld argues, “Schools cannot teach students to evaluate information and make good choices, because so much of what students would instinctively access is blocked.” (Rosenfeld, 2008)

A number of significant skills are not being learned or developed because students don’t have access to these new interactive web 2.0 technologies such as YouTube at school. These are the skills required to participate, collaborate, and contribute to the information process in a meaningful and effective way. YouTube is a dynamic site, and the skills that need to be developed in order for students to contribute to it effectively include video productions skills, audio production skills, presentation skills, scriptwriting skills, basic literacy skills, web skills, knowledge about promotion and marketing, evaluation skills, and search strategy skills. The idea and importance of learning the skills needed for participation and collaboration in digital media such as YouTube, not just the consumption of it, is an issue that Henry Jenkins (2006) also advocates in his paper Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture. Jenkins argues that,

In a world where it is often difficult to determine the source and status of the media we are consuming, traditional literacy and research skills are no longer sufficient. We should no longer consider young people to be media literate if they can consume but not produce media. It's like confusing penmanship with composition” (Jenkins, 2006).

Educators and students are also missing out on opportunities to create and participate in dynamic educational experiences and opportunities using video sharing sites such as YouTube to engage with learning. This idea was explored by Anna Adam and Helen Mowers in their article YouTube Comes to the Classroom, which looks at ways in which YouTube is being used as an effective educational tool in the classroom, and in particular, as a platform for giving students a voice.

“YouTube can be a valuable resource and is just one more example of the potential of Web 2.0 tools, which, in the hands of enlightened educators, can inspire students and support their digital learning style. Youngsters will always want a voice--it's up to us to utilize available resources, such as YouTube, to help our students create content that is relevant and engaging”. (Adam & Mowers, 2007)


Burnt Bridges

Another facet in this discussion about the inclusion of sites such as YouTube in schools is the idea of building bridges. Building bridges not only across the digital divide, but also across the generational divide and from students’ lives outside the classroom, to their experiences in the classroom. If young people are participating in digital media and social networking sites such as YouTube in a whole range of ways in their out of school lives, then one way to add value to that and to help young people’s educational experiences to be more meaningful is to create a bridge to the classroom.  As Jenkins argues,

We are raising a generation of media producers and distributors who are doing what previous authors have done—create a dialogue with existing cultural traditions. So, librarians have a role to play in helping them to understand the poetics and politics of appropriation, to help them understand what constitutes a meaningful engagement with existing cultural materials and what constitutes intellectual dishonesty or violations of copyright. This brings us back to the ideal of the librarian as a facilitator of new forms of research and expression, rather than as a curator and archivist of traditional print materials” (Jenkins, 2006).

By allowing students to use YouTube at school, and teaching them the skills that are required to use it effectively, educators can add relevance and value to their students’ experiences both in the classroom and outside it. 

A Call to Arms…

So now what? What can we as teacher-librarians and teachers do if our students can’t access YouTube at school? Rosenfeld makes a strong argument that it is up to us to fight for this, and show the decision makers that there is value in YouTube, and that by blocking students’ access to it, they are also blocking knowledge and skills and relevant educational experiences. We need to show them examples of its effective use, and highlight the gaps that are being created by the exclusion of YouTube. That the dangers of not allowing this conversation and experience to take place at school are far greater than allowing it to take place behind closed doors without the adequate skills, guidance, and understandings of the applications and implications of using YouTube.

“As teacher-librarians, we need to press our principals, our technology administrators, our district superintendents, and our school boards to provide the type of web access necessary for 21st-century teaching and learning. We need to show decision makers exemplars of the fine work and outstanding practices that are occurring in schools that have such access. We need to educate decision makers and change their minds about filtering collaborative tools and sites. We need to lobby for district-acceptable use policies that explicitly state that students are using Web 2.0 tools, and we need to provide examples of the proper use of these tools. By advocating for such Web 2.0 access, we can help to create the information-rich environment that students and teachers need”. (Rosenfeld, 2008)


References:


Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Sayuri’s blog entry about transformative / innovation pedagogies

Retrieved 7 October, 2010 from
http://walkinthewords.blogspot.com/2008/11/thanksgiving-pragmatics.html

How do I teach Pragmatics1 through Web 2.0 sites like Youtube and facebook?

In this blog entry, I will demonstrate my innovative pedagogies in terms of my teaching context, which are Language Other Than English (LOTE): Japanese though using Web 2.0 technologies.

Prensky (2010) argues that writing and reading skills are not as important as they once were because they are not the best way for human beings to communicate their thoughts. ‘‘Reading does not just happen’’ and ‘‘It is a terrible struggle’’ (Roylance, as cited in Prensky, 2010, p. 126). Therefore, as opposed to writing their ideas, people have begun putting them into video. Indeed, there is an increasing degradation of reading and writing skills occurring in America because eighty percent of the population is using You Tube and short videos to communicate (Prensky, 2010).

I agree with Prensky’s argument to some extent, but in terms of language learning and teaching, I believe other skills such as reading and writing are important. Oxford (1990) agrees, arguing that listening is essential to enhance the other three language skills of speaking, reading and writing. I believe that these four skills are interconnected, and as the learning of all four are emphasised through the Japanese LOTE syllabus (Queensland Studies Authority, 2008), all four skills will be practised in my classroom.

However, I also feel that viewing videos is useful not only for pronunciation, accent, vocabulary and idioms, but also for the important cultural contexts of when certain expressions can be used. Intercultural learning, also known as pragmatics, is important as lack of this cultural knowledge may lead to misunderstandings and communication breakdown. When you learn a foreign language, gaining pragmatic competence is critical, yet it is very difficult to acquire, particularly within the classroom. As Silva and Restivo (2008) claim, I believe using social networking sites such as Youtube, will assist learners in practicing and developing their pragmatic, or intercultural, competence. I will now discuss some actual exercises that I will run in my classroom to demonstrate how this pragmatics education can occur.

In order to create culturally-based contexts2 within my Japanese classroom, I will select relevant video clips that emphasise each learning objective. For example…


Inside my classroom

1. I will show a YouTube clip which demonstrates pragmatics. Students will try to interpret and analyse the video to learn the appropriate cultural expression.

2. I will teach specific pragmatic elements explicitly through video clips and/or sentences in some social networking sites. Students will view the clip a few times and then, using their critical thinking, will create new insights. In order for students to observe non-verbal aspects such as body language and rituals, I will play the scenes without sound.

3. Students will practise with video clips and speaking sentences. Through this, students will develop their understanding between their own language and culture and their target language and culture.

4. Students will create subtitles for a YouTube video clip.

5. Students reflect on their own language and culture and their target language and its culture through a blog. In this blog, students review what they have learned and how they feel about it by expressing themselves in writing.

6. In order to be pragmatically competent, learners need to be exposed to real life communication as much as possible. Therefore, learners should be provided with the opportunity to practice their language and intercultural aspects through social networking sites such as YouTube and Facebook. This might be done through forming an online relationship with a sister school in Japan.


Digital space outside my classroom

Blog entry

I will provide scenarios2 where students will be required to use the learnt form of the vocabulary or intercultural aspects. Since students will have different learning abilities, I will provide multiple questions they can pick from. Each student will answer two questions – one that they will answer and one that they will provide feedback on the answers on. I will monitor this so each student will only receive beneficial feedback.

Depending on a level, the words count will be adjusted but students will be required to use learnt forms, grammar and vocabulary. They will be allowed to have discussion in their first language.


Digital role-play

With their sister school in Japan, students will read the scenario below and create a conversation. Students will be monitored to make sure they ask appropriate questions and understand the cultural context.

Scenario: Person A: Ask them to go out to a movie. Person B: Reply that you can’t go because you are not interested in the movie. What would be the best way for person B to say no to person A?


Video clips

Students, either individually or in groups, demonstrate their knowledge by finding an appropriate video clip related to intercultural aspects. Many good quality videos are found by students so this is an opportunity for the teacher to learn as well.

As a group, students can produce their own video clips. For example, show the daily life of Australian student in a way that a visiting Japanese exchange student would understand.


In conclusion, I believe task based digital assignments that facilitate student-centre and meaningful peer interactions are excellent tools to assist language learners. As I have demonstrated through my classroom exercises, I believe that taking advantage of social networking sites is an excellent way of teaching pragmatics.



Footnotes

1: The meanings and effects which come from the use of language in particular situations.

2: Videos dealing with some aspects such as formal and informal communication including honorific systems in Japanese and English, behaviours, humours and taboos, stereotypes, paraverbal and nonverbal communication and intercultural conflicts.

3: Some sample questions regarding speech act are…

1) You are going to home stay in Japan. You would like to give souvenir to your Japanese home stay family. What would you normally say when you give it to them? Why? What do you think of the Japanese expression? What would you say if you are in the Australian context? How about other ways and expression from other culture?

2) What would the family say to you? (some potential expressions) Why do some Japanese people do not open the gift immediately? What do you think about it?



References

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: what every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House/Happer & Row.

Prensky, M. (2010). Why You Tube matters. Why it is so important, why we should all be using it, and why blocking it blocks our kids’ education. ON THE HORIZON, 18(2), 124-131.

Queensland Studies Authority. (2008). Japanese Senior Syllabus. Retrieved October 5, 2010

Silva, J. F., & Restivo, F. J. (2008). E -assessment through Social Networks in a Portuguese High School Context - A Conceptual Framework. Retrieved October 1, 2010, from



Appendix: Useful self-language/culture learning sites

The more you use your language the better your language become!

These sites are authentic self-learning spaces for language learners who cannot experience their authentic target culture.

1.Lang8 is highly beneficial free site for students who are at any level to develop their second language ability. Because Lang8 focuses on writing, it helps learners improve their writing skills including grammar and vocabulary. It does this through corrections by native speakers who are also learning and/or interested language learning and teaching. Due to the length of time required for writing tasks, this site might also be useful for homework in classroom context.

2.For more advanced students who would like to expand their language and intercultural competency, I will recommend the biggest Japanese social networking site called mixi.

Sayuri’s blog entry about an online resource

An example of Pragmatics1 in foreign language learning

Pragmatics should be taught explicitly (Amaya, 2008).  Pragmatic transfer problems occur due to the learner’s assumptions of universality and transferability.  This is one of the most difficult yet important for L2 learners to gain.  But if they do not have the knowledge and competence, serious communication breakdown may occur.  For example, the phrase “green light” could mean many things depending on the context – it could mean to drive through a set of traffic lights or that you have the go ahead on a work project.

This video clip (Aibu Saki Misudo CM Burando, 2007) illustrates an excellent example of Pragmatics and intercultural aspects including the Japanese sense of humour.

A boring thing to give you?




“Tsumaranai mono desu ga…” This is one of the Japanese particular ways to express politeness.  This expression is used when you give a souvenir to someone like your boss or neighbours but not for your family or friends.  There is not an equivalent English expression for this.  Probably it is similar to "this is not a very valuable thing, (but please take it)".  It literally means "a boring thing for you".

In Western culture, a present’s intention is about how a receiver feels and it often “talked up” by the giver with phrases such as “This is a wonderful thing for you”.  But in the Japanese way, how a provider feels toward a present is focused on and it is expressed as an uncertain thing such as “You are wonderful, so I am not sure if this is suitable for you who has such a good eye for these things”.  With this expression, a receiver may be able to generous toward the present which is not proper for her/him.  This expression derives from the Japanese virtues of modesty. Depending on the context, we use it even if giving a very nice or expensive thing.  It also means a receiver feels less pressure when accepting the gift.

In conclusion, I believe this video, with its supportive and correct commentary, allows scaffolding for better understanding of the intercultural aspects.  But, as this video is only suitable for people who already understand the different meaning of the expression, the explicit teaching of pragmatics is still important to ensure cultural accuracy.


Footnotes

1: The meanings and effects which come from the use of language in particular situations.


References

Aibu Saki Misudo CM Burando (Binkanhen) [A piece of commercial for a Japanese doughnuts company named Mr. Doughnuts performed by Saki Aibu and Jorge Murakami (A sensitive version)] (Sayuri Shirakoma,Trans.). (2007). [Video webcast]. Retrieved October 3, 2010, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtcQnklEHfg

Amaya, L. F. (2008). Teaching Culture: Is It Possible to Avoid Pragmatic Failure?, Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 21, 11-24. Retrieved October 2, 2010, from


Appendix

The details of the YouTube clip

Though this is only a fifteen second clip, it contains many cultural references.  The clip is a section from a Japanese Doughnuts Company’s commercial.  The commercial was released specially during the summer period when Japanese people give each other gifts to show their appreciation.  (The custom is called O-cyugen and is normally held in July).

The purpose of the clip is to encourage people to buy doughnuts for the O-cyugen custom.  It does this by showing a humorous interaction between two people playing on the word tsumaranai.  Because this word has two different meanings, the humour is achieved through the inversion of the status of the two characters.

Here is a breakdown of the commercial…

• The two people are a master (teacher) and an apprentice.
• Osewa ni natta ano kata ni  (お世話になったあの方に) 
-Osewa ni naru (natta; past tense) – The one of the most used Japanese expression: Being taken care of ( by someone)
- Ano kata ni – to that person in honorific
• The apprentice is trying to give O-cyugen to her master with two hands by saying “ It’s not something great…”.
• The way to show the box of gift: With two hands
• The special type of room, sitting positions, the way to sit and the way to put her hands on her
thigh.
• A traditional hanging calligraphy (The master potentially teaches tea ceremony, calligraphy or
Japanese flower arrangement.)
• The words of the hanging calligraphy: 失笑 – these two characters mean bursting out laughing in a situation when should not laugh.  



There is an interesting interpretation of this Japanese expression from a Korean student.

A Korean learner of Japanese says “This is not very valuable thing, but please enjoy it.” So literally, in Japanese, this means “This is a boring thing, but please have it interestingly.” Retreived October 10, 2010, from http://home.alc.co.jp/db/owa/jpn_tchquiz



Additional self-study about analysing another YouTube clip regarding pragmatics



Three anonymous comments about this video clip

1. This is a Joke. Please do not misunderstand it!
2. This is not a joke, I have seen Japanese do these things all the time.
3. Hilarious, the series of comedy videos is great!

My opinion

As a Japanese national and language teacher, I understand and agree with the comments below.  I can see the first comment was made by a Japanese person and understand their perspective.  But the second comment raises a good point; though the actions portrayed in the clip are based in truth they are exaggerated.  This raises the issue of how people, particularly non-native Japanese, can determine which parts of the video clip (and people’s comments) are “real” and which are exaggerated?

Saturday, October 9, 2010

Sayuri’s blog entry about a journal article

Retrieved 7 October, 2010 from http://www.fadetoplay.com/2009/01/22/facebook-and-education/


What are the some of the advantages and disadvantages of using Facebook in an educational context?


Introduction
 
Social networking sites such as Facebook are enormously popular with youth today.  Because of this popularity, there has been an emphasis on educators to utilise it as an educational tool.  However, the measurable educational benefits of Web 2.0 technologies are still being debated by interested parties such as schools and parents alike.

In this blog entry, I will discuss the educational impact of using Facebook in an educational context.  I will do this by analysing the content of “The Facebook Generation: Homework as Social Networking” (Kitsis, 2008).  Secondly, my own response to this article in terms of its relevance to my pedagogy will be examined.


What are the some of the advantages of using Facebook in an educational context?
 
Facebook is one of the most popular websites for students between grades 4-12 (Fodeman & Monroe, 2009).  Kitis believes that because this generation of social networkers has displayed an eagerness to know both what other people think and how other people perceive their ideas, they are investing large amounts of their daily time and energy using Web 2.0 technologies.  This natural investment provides educators with a unique opportunity.  Because of the students’ natural motivation and engagement with others through Facebook, it provides a useful and fun learning environment compared to the sometimes more artificial classroom based assignments.

“Truth is not born nor is it to be found inside the head of an individual person, it is born between people collectively searching for truth, in the process of their dialogic interaction” (Bakhtin as cite in Kitsis, 2008, p. 30).  Facebook uses this dialogic interaction as it facilitates learners in thinking critically about their learning through the exchanging of ideas.

Kitis also argues that Facebook also connects students with each other in collaborative learning and as peer learning and peer feedback are excellent educational strategies, it assists in teaching critical thinking and social and communication skills.  It does this by promoting the opportunity for students to have an audience and to respond each other’s ideas freely and meaningfully.  As the best thinking arises when examining ideas in a non-threatening and informal setting, utilising social networking environments can be rewarding for students and teachers.

Knowledge is scaffolded and constructed by exchange of dialogue.  Therefore, social networking site such as Facebook can be a good educational tool in order for students to perceive their peers’ ideas as well as their own ideas, and to construct their knowledge through interaction with others.  The following quote supports this concept. “For one cannot even really see one’s own exterior and comprehend it as a whole, and no mirrors or photographs can help; our real exterior can be seen and understood only by other people, because they are located outside us…” (Morson & Emerson as cited in Kitsis, 2008, p. 31).

Kitis also believes that by empowering students to use online learning, it can motivate them to put in more effort since their other students will read, and provide feedback on, their work.  In addition, diverse students’ needs can be resolved not by feedback from a sole teacher but by peer learning. This also promotes student responsibility as they must provide feedback to their peers.


What are the some disadvantages of using Facebook in an educational context?

Kitis feels that the internet access and scheduling conflicts with partners is one of the most common challenges students face.  Pair work may be a better solution in terms of scheduling, however a group size of three or four seems more optimum in there are unexpected changes such as a partner falling ill.

Kitis argues that words count should be limited in order to sustain decent sharing time.  She also believes that the teacher should explain the value of assignments, along with prompt feedback on the assignments, should be provided by teacher.  Failing to do this could mean that proper effort if not made by the students in completing their tasks as they, for want of a better word, can’t see the point of the work.  In order to keep students’ learning and feedback more authentic, deadlines should be assigned by the teacher.

Kitis also warns of the importance of teaching students about the internet safety of keeping students’ privacy protected.  Hence first name only or a blog name should be used.  Although a real name will be revealed to their teacher at the end, students, particularly more reserved students feel more comfortable to express their ideas while using their pen name.

Kitis (2008, p. 34) states “my students are typically more thoughtful and courteous online than they are in the heat of a class debate”.  However, methods of providing meaningful feedback should be taught to students. Kitis found her students have more difficulties in giving critical feedback and tend to provide kind and positive feedback.  In order to bridge this critical feedback gap scaffolding student’s learning is an important function the teacher must fulfil.


My personal response to this article 

In my teaching context as a future Japanese teacher in Australian secondary schools, I believe utilising Facebook expands the traditional pedagogical boundaries of the classroom and allows alternate learning environments.

Generally, second language (L2) learners feel vulnerable and less confident in speaking L2 in classroom, but feel more relaxed to express themselves in writing.  Anonymous digital space encourages students to communicate more and, as they will have audience, they pay more attention to their L2 grammar, vocabulary and spelling.  Web2. 0 encourages learners to participate, practise, produce and remix but because safety and privacy reasons, I will create a separate digital space dedicated for classroom.  Indeed, a blog or wiki may be alternative solution.

Issues in foreign language teaching such as unnatural discourses, teacher talk, teacher-centred class and a lack of opportunities for learners to deal with negative pragmatic transfers1 can be overcome by Web2.0 like Facebook because discourse occurs naturally.  Kabilan, Ahmad, and Abidin (2010) also emphasises that learning does not have to be taught by a teacher and/or in a formal classroom.  In respect of this, the digital space can assist language learners to interact in linguistically, culturally and pragmatically in more natural ways. Therefore, for example, setting up a digital space with a sister school in Japan may be an excellent way to take advantage of a social networking site.

However, negative pragmatic transfers should be taught explicitly (Takimoto, 2006) and their correction should not be left to chance in Web 2.0 technologies.  Pragmatic2 challenges will be explained in one of other blog entries through examining a YouTube video clip.  I will also explore my pedagogy in my teaching context how teaching pragmatics can be taught through social networking sites.

Overall, social networking sites can be a supportive learning resource.  However, educators are required to provide their class with knowledge and techniques of appropriate use Web 2.0 so that the technologies are used to their full educational potential.


Footnotes

1: Learners use the communication strategies of their first language even when they are using the second language.
2: The meanings and effects which come from the use of language in particular situations.


References

Fodeman, D., & Monroe, M. (2009). The impact of Facebook on our students. Teacher Librarian, 36(5), 36-40.

Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). FaceBook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education?. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 101-176.

Kitsis, S. M. (2008). The Facebook Generation: Homework as Social Networking. English Journal, 98(2), 30–36.

Takimoto, M. (2006). The effects of explicit feedback on the development of pragmatic proficiency. Language Teaching Research. 10(4). 393-417. Retrieved October 3, 2010, from Sage journals online database.